Problem with nand flash while booting 2.6.30
Mike Rapoport
mike at compulab.co.il
Thu Aug 13 01:25:06 EDT 2009
Hi Saurabh,
(Adding linux-mtd back to CC)
Saurabh Kadekodi wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I have already enabled the NAND_BUILTIN in the kernel configuration.
> That is why it iterated through all the providers and then since it
> couldn't match any of the providers it printed 'Unknown'.
Try setting .keep_config in pxa3xx_nand_platform_data in your board
configuration file. This will tell the driver to preserve controller settings
set up by the bootloader.
> Actually it is a Micron Nand flash.
>
> It can't be a jffs2 problem since the driver itself cannot recognize
> the hardware. Can it be timing related?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Saurabh
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Mike Rapoport<mike at compulab.co.il> wrote:
>>
>> Saurabh Kadekodi wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am working on a board with pxa320 processor. It has a micron 128 mb
>>> flash. It boots well with kernel 2.6.25, but when booting with 2.6.30,
>>> it somehow cannot detect the nand chip properly.
>>>
>>> It shows following messages:
>>>
>>> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip ID: 0xa1 (Unknown NAND 128MiB
>>> 1,8V 8-bit)
>>>
>>> While with 2.6.25 it properly detects as a micron flash.
>> Make sure that you either select CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PXA3xx_BUILTIN or set
>> .keep_config flag in pxa3xx_nand_platform_data in your board configuration.
>>
>>> Then later it gives a lot of ECC errors and prints the following messages:
>>>
>>>
>>> Cowardly refusing to erase blocks on filesystem with no valid JFFS2 nodes
>>>> empty_blocks 0, bad_blocks 208, c->nr_blocks 438
>>>> VFS: Cannot open root device "mtdblock2" or unknown-block(31,2)
>>>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
>>>> 1f00 256 mtdblock0 (driver?)
>>>> 1f01 2048 mtdblock1 (driver?)
>>>> 1f02 112128 mtdblock2 (driver?)
>>>> 1f03 512 mtdblock3 (driver?)
>>>> b300 2008064 mmcblk0 driver: mmcblk
>>>> b301 31288 mmcblk0p1
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(31,2)
>>>> Backtrace:
>>>> [<c0028a34>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0028b78>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
>>>> r6:c03af144 r5:c001d884 r4:cf81df54
>>>> [<c0028b60>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c003ca9c>] (panic+0x60/0x13c)
>>>> [<c003ca3c>] (panic+0x0/0x13c) from [<c0008dac>] (mount_block_root+0x104/0x234)
>>>> r3:00000000 r2:20000013 r1:cf81df54 r0:c0330e50
>>>> [<c0008ca8>] (mount_block_root+0x0/0x234) from [<c0008fb8>] (mount_root+0xdc/0x100)
>>>> [<c0008edc>] (mount_root+0x0/0x100) from [<c0009024>] (prepare_namespace+0x48/0x190)
>>>> r7:00000000 r6:c001d840 r5:c001d83c r4:c03ae0c4
>>>> [<c0008fdc>] (prepare_namespace+0x0/0x190) from [<c00087dc>] (kernel_init+0xc8/0xf4)
>>>> r6:c001cdec r5:c001cb58 r4:c03ae0b8
>>>> [<c0008714>] (kernel_init+0x0/0xf4) from [<c003fc90>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6c8)
>>>> r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:00000000
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please can someone guide me as to what maybe wrong. The flash cannot
>>> be corrupt as
>>> 2.6.25 boots correctly. Then where am I going wrong?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> Saurabh
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________
>>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Mike.
>>
>>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list