[Patch 1/1] don't suspend erase for erase in cfi_cmdset_0002
Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se
Mon Aug 3 09:28:51 EDT 2009
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 03/08/2009 15:25:10:
>
> Peter Wippich <pewi at gw-instruments.de> wrote on 03/08/2009 15:07:30:
> >
> >
> > Hi Jocke,
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > linux-mtd-bounces at lists.infradead.org wrote on 03/08/2009 12:50:44:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > came around this problem while stress testing jffs2. From time to time the
> > > > block erase failed and the file system overflows. I don't know if there
> > > > are any Nor chips out there which allow a new erase to start when in erase
> > > > suspend. However, the chips on my board dont't. And even when it doesn't
> > > > make much sense to suspend an erase operation for another erase.
> > > >
> > > > Patch below fixes the problem for me.
> > > >
> > > > Have fun and take care,
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wippich <pewi at gw-instruments.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > diff -Naur a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> > > > b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 2007-07-10 20:56:30.000000000 +0200
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c 2009-08-02 19:55:34.000000000 +0200
> > > > @@ -521,6 +521,10 @@
> > > > case FL_ERASING:
> > > > if (mode == FL_WRITING) /* FIXME: Erase-suspend-program appears broken. */
> > > > goto sleep;
> > > > + if (mode == FL_ERASING) {
> > > > + printk(KERN_INFO "attempt erase suspend with mode FL_ERASING\n") ;
> > > > + goto sleep;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > if (!( mode == FL_READY
> > > > || mode == FL_POINT
> > > >
> > >
> > > This change looks bogus. You are not supposed to need the extra test.
> > > I do think this test is faulty though:
> > >
> > > if (!( mode == FL_READY
> > > || mode == FL_POINT
> > > || !cfip
> > > || (mode == FL_WRITING && (cfip->EraseSuspend & 0x2))
> > > || (mode == FL_WRITING && (cfip->EraseSuspend & 0x1)
> > > )))
> > >
> > > What happens if cfip is NULL?
> >
> > Checked this one. Because the Chip is jedec probed (not cfi) and there is
> > no fixup cfip should be NULL. Then the above will evaluate to :
> > mode == FL_READY = FALSE
> > mode == FL_POINT = FALSE
> > !cfip = TRUE
> > (next two skipped, hopefully ...... ;-)
> >
> > End ! TRUE = FALSE -> we will not go to sleep ! Actually, it is not quite
> > clear to me what the intention of this expression was. But if the original
> > intention was to only allow erase suspend when requested mode is FL_READY
> > or FL_POINT it is obviously wrong.....
> Probably:
> if (!cfip || !(cfip->EraseSuspend & (0x1|0x2)) ||
> !(mode == FL_READY || mode == FL_POINT ||
> (mode == FL_WRITING && (cfip->EraseSuspend & 0x2))))
>
> Pehaps you can remove the
> if (mode == FL_WRITING) /* FIXME: Erase-suspend-program appears broken. */
> goto sleep;
> too? ( in a separate patch though)
Oh, you will have to fake/construct a cfip too for you JEDEC chip.
Jocke
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list