No subject

@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ static int atmel_nand_calculate(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 {
 	struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
 	struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
-	uint32_t *eccpos = nand_chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
 	unsigned int ecc_value;

 	/* get the first 2 ECC bytes */

Which is the same subroutine as your change, but a strange difference in line
numbers. Which makes me think you have changes in this file as well.


> 
> Here is the log that I have running with this patch:
> "
> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0xda (Samsung NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit)
> AT91 NAND: 8-bit, Software ECC
> nand_scan_tail ecc.total = 24, ecc.steps = 8, ecc.bytes = 3, ecc.size = 256, writesize = 2048
> nand_scan_tail oobfree[0].offset=2, .length=38
> Scanning device for bad blocks
> Bad eraseblock 881 at 0x06e20000
> Creating 3 MTD partitions on "atmel_nand":
> 0x00000000-0x00400000 : "Bootstrap"
> 0x00400000-0x04000000 : "Partition 1"
> 0x04000000-0x10000000 : "Partition 2"
> "
> 
> All seems ok.
> 
> So, with the above line replaced, I would like to add to both patches:
> 
> [nicolas.ferre at atmel.com: tested on large page nand sw ECC]
> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
> 
> Regards,


Thanks for testing. I appreciate it.


Troy