UBIFS Corrupt during power failure

[Jamie Lokier]

Eric Holmberg wrote:
> > Is this really different from NAND and it's page writes?
> > Do the CFI block writes have to be aligned (to 64 bytes) offset, or
> > can the 64 bytes start at any word position?
> 
> Looking through the data sheet again, it looks like there is the concept
> of a page for block writes in this particular NOR flash where a page
> starts on any address evenly divisible by 0x20 (32-byte block).  The CFI
> driver handles this when splitting up the blocks.
> 
> Here's the datasheet for reference:
>  * http://www.spansion.com/datasheets/s29gl-p_00_a11_e.pdf?page=28
> 
> Thinking about it, this shouldn't affect the maximum possible corruption
> count, since a fully-aligned write buffer is the worst case (a possible
> of a <=64-byte corruption).  If the block is split between pages, then
> 32-bytes would occur in the first write and 32-bytes in the second
> write, so the maximum corruption would be <=32 bytes.
>
> Does this match with your thoughts?

Yes.  Another parameter could be exported by MTD: the max block
corruption alignment, 32 in this case.  Then UBIFS's scanner (or other
tools) could be a little more accurate.

I doubt if it's important to scan more accurately, but it would be a
good parameter to export from MTD anyway, while adding the other one,
just to describe the chip properly for tools, diagnostics etc.

Unrelated to this chip: I vaguely remember, aren't there some flash
chips which can do more than one block write in parallel, or a write
in parallel with an erase to a different block?

-- Jamie