[patch/rfc 2.6.29 2/2] MTD: support driver model updates
David Brownell
david-b at pacbell.net
Wed Apr 1 01:57:37 EDT 2009
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > @@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ static int __init mxcnd_probe(struct pla
> > mtd = &host->mtd;
> > mtd->priv = this;
> > mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > + mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>
> Could this be done for all NANDs in nand_base.c instead?
By adding the device as a parameter to nand_scan(),
and presumably nand_scan_ident() ... which is a more
invasive API change, and would require a "flag day"
to convert all drivers.
My default assumption for API changes is to avoid
flag days. They can be done, yes, but I don't see
a compelling reason to choose one here.
- Dave
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list