big flash disks?

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind at infradead.org
Mon Jun 2 01:59:19 EDT 2008


On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 19:42 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Some people developing newer flash filesystems (UBIFS, Logfs,
> FAT-over-UBI :-) and interested in flash filesystem performance might
> be interested in this slashdot comment:
> 
>     http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=569439&cid=23618215
> 
> They're implying that UBIFS and Logfs aren't suitable for high
> performance writes and/or large flash, and don't work well with up and
> coming flash disks either.
> 
> Also that patents may get in the way.
> 
> I've never heard of MFT before.

People should understand that UBIFS is designed for embedded systems. It
is good for low-price devices where you have just bare flash which is
cheap. SSD is a completely different area and irrelevant to UBIFS. The
same applies for LogFS and YAFFS IMO. Talking about using these FS-es on
SSD is just silly (again IMHO).

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list