JFFS2 determine writing state
Jamie Lokier
jamie at shareable.org
Tue Jan 15 16:51:44 EST 2008
Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 15 January 2008 17:35:10 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >
> > Oh, ok, I thought it at least merged things in the page cache like
> > most other filesystems. It seems it's more like O_DSYNC - or more
> > like O_SYNC (commits metadata changed for every write too)?
>
> I don't think there is a really good equivalent. Writes happen
> immediatly, but the changes may not become effective immediatly. In a
> way, the worst of both worlds. :)
I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by that. Let me guess:
Do you mean that MTD write operations are started by write(), but
write() returns before the writes are committed reliably?
If so does fsync/fdatasync/sync_page_range ensure that the preceding
writes are committed reliably? And does that include fsync on a
directory following an atomic rename (for reliable replacement of a
file)?
> > Also, does LogFS (which I want to try later) have similar
> > characteristics?
>
> At the moment, yes. Most likely I won't get the caching part done
> before LCA.
I guess write caching is an interesting beast for such a structured
filesystem. It would seem like a good opportunity to coalesce some
tree node updates, something applications can't do themselves.
Looking forward to it :-)
-- Jamie
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list