Global changelogs about

Brijesh Singh brijesh.s.singh at gmail.com
Fri Feb 29 09:53:35 EST 2008


With all respect,I think this discussion(Miscommunication) is going
too far..And it is not in members interest either.

Sorry in advance.(Incase someone didn't like interruption. )


---
Brijesh


On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Schlägl Manfred jun.
<manfred.schlaegl at gmx.at> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 29.02.2008, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Jörn Engel:
>
> > On Fri, 29 February 2008 09:42:57 +0100, Schlägl Manfred jun. wrote:
>  > >
>  > > My request wasn't meant like that. I don't wanted to affront the people
>  > > here. I just wanted to know, if such a list of critical bugs or problems
>  > > exist for the last few years. Don't you think such a list would be
>  > > useful for people who want to get in mtd(+nand) using and development?
>  > >
>  > >  If such a list not exist i'll create it by my self and make it public
>  > > to you and the others. I know: It's MY work to do, I just not wanted to
>  > > do work twice.
>  >
>  > No such list exists, afaik.
>  Thank you. Thats what i wanted to know.
>
>
>  >  Generally people tend to either use the
>  > latest kernels or backport drivers/mtd/ and fs/jffs2/ along with any
>  > dependencies to their respective kernels.
>  >
>  > > Again, I'm sorry .. I hope, you understand the reason of my request.
>  >
>  > No worries.  This lists gets a fair share of both "my kernel is five
>  > years old, but I want all bugfixes and performance improvements from the
>  > newest code" and "can you provide free consulting".  Neither is greeted
>  > with much enthusiasm and your mail appeared to match both.
>  First of all: I'm not a leecher. I don't subscribed to this list to get
>  free support from you. That my first post was such a question was more
>  or less by chance.
>
>  Back to the list: I don't wanted this bug-list to build a 2.6.12 with
>  newest code.. I wanted this list to get an black on white impression of
>  the firmness of mtd over time. To see if there were some critical bugs
>  solved in near past. To see some statistical issues. If you think, such
>  an approach is stupid, it's your oppinion and i'll respect it, if you
>  give me some reasons..
>  Again: My interrest does not belong to solve only my current issues.. I
>  just wanted to get an impression of mtd over time.
>
>
>  >
>  > Jörn
>  >
>  respects
>         Manfred
>
>
>
>
>
>  ______________________________________________________
>  Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>  http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list