[PATCH 4/4] UBI WL-Subsys: Improvement in prot tree

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:11 +0800, xiaochuan-xu wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:44 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > 
> > I think it does not matter much and we may use the same constant for
> > short term and unknown eraseblocks. I do not see much difference
> > between
> > 8 or 16. Does it really matter? We just want to prevent this
> > eraseblock
> > from being moved for some reasonable "time". And everything depends on
> > work-load of course. So I think just using the same constant for all
> > PEB
> 
> My opposite experiment indicates that such unified-protection-time
> method seems to be not better than the different-protection-time one in
> run time. the system run time fluctuates. 

I guess you would have to write a very special test to see any difference.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)