[PATCH 2/2][MTD] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
>> I'm not sure I'd say I _vetoed_ new ioctls, but I certainly expressed a
>> desire to do all the information stuff through sysfs. We would need a
>> new MEMERASE64 ioctl though.
> 
> If the (lack of) sysfs stuff is standing between us and a nice >4GiB mtd 
> I for one would think that a set of 64-bit ioctls would be a reasonable 
> halfway house.

On the other hand we'll stay with half-solutions forever if we allow them.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)