Question about ubimkvol vs. mkfs.ubifs

Tue Apr 8 12:54:56 EDT 2008

On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 09:45 -0700, Bruce_Leonard at selinc.com wrote:
> One would think so, but I keep running into division and modulo problems 
> (because doing 64-bit division in the kernel is strongly frowned upon, for 
> good reasons), and once I work through all those issues I get seg faults, 
> etc, etc, etc.  You know...the usual development things ;).

Hmm. Do you divide 64-bit offset on eraseblock size? Could generally
make sense to change MTD interfaces to accept eraseblock:offset pair
instead?

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)