choosing a file system to use on NAND/UBI

Hamish Moffatt hamish at cloud.net.au
Mon Apr 7 03:48:36 EDT 2008


On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> UBI attach time appears to be about 6 seconds.
> 
> [    0.960000] NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0xdc (Samsung NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit)
> [    0.970000] Scanning device for bad blocks
> [    1.020000] Bad eraseblock 494 at 0x03dc0000
> [    1.110000] Bad eraseblock 1300 at 0x0a280000
> [    1.240000] Bad eraseblock 2554 at 0x13f40000
> [    1.280000] Bad eraseblock 2923 at 0x16d60000
> [    1.330000] Bad eraseblock 3349 at 0x1a2a0000
> [    1.370000] Bad eraseblock 3790 at 0x1d9c0000
> [    1.410000] cmdlinepart partition parsing not available
> [    7.210000] UBI: attached mtd9 to ubi0

Less with some NAND glue improvements.

[    0.960000] NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0xdc (Samsung NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit)
[    0.970000] Scanning device for bad blocks
[    1.010000] Bad eraseblock 494 at 0x03dc0000
[    1.060000] Bad eraseblock 1300 at 0x0a280000
[    1.140000] Bad eraseblock 2554 at 0x13f40000
[    1.170000] Bad eraseblock 2923 at 0x16d60000
[    1.200000] Bad eraseblock 3349 at 0x1a2a0000
[    1.230000] Bad eraseblock 3790 at 0x1d9c0000
[    1.260000] cmdlinepart partition parsing not available
[    6.910000] UBI: attached mtd9 to ubi0



Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish at debian.org> <hamish at cloud.net.au>



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list