BUG at mm/filemap.c:1749 (2.6.24, jffs2, unionfs)
Nick Piggin
nickpiggin at yahoo.com.au
Fri Oct 19 03:03:11 EDT 2007
On Friday 19 October 2007 16:05, Erez Zadok wrote:
> David,
>
> I'm testing unionfs on top of jffs2, using 2.6.24 as of linus's commit
> 4fa4d23fa20de67df919030c1216295664866ad7. All of my unionfs tests pass
> when unionfs is stacked on top of jffs2, other than my truncate test --
> whic tries to truncate files up/down (through the union, which then is
> passed through to the lower jffs2 f/s). The same truncate test passes on
> all other file systems I've tried unionfs/2.6.24 with, as well as all of
> the earlier kernels that unionfs runs on (2.6.9--2.6.23). So I tend to
> think this bug is more probably due to something else going on in 2.6.24,
> possibly wrt jffs2/mtd. (Of course, it's still possible that unionfs isn't
> doing something right -- any pointers?)
>
> The oops trace is included below. Is this a known issue and if so, any
> fixes? If this is the first you hear of this problem, let me know and I'll
> try to narrow it down further.
It's had quite a lot of recent changes in that area -- the "new aops"
patches.
They've been getting quite a bit of testing in -mm and no such problems,
but I doubt anyone was doing much unionfs over jffs2, or even much jffs2
testing with -mm.
The bug smells like jffs2 is actually passing back a "written" length
greater than the length we passed into it.
The following might show what's happening.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mm-debug.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 738 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20071019/df2d23b4/attachment.bin
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list