[PATCH] LogFS take three

[Jamie Lokier]

David Weinehall wrote:
> > It is also the filesystem that tries to scale logarithmically, as Arnd
> > has noted.  Maybe I should call it Log2 to emphesize this point.  Log1
> > would be horrible scalability.
> 
> So, log2fs...  Sounds great to me.

Why Log2?  Logarithmic scaling is just logarithmic scaling.  Does the
filesystem use 2-ary trees or anything else which gives particular
meaning to 2?

-- Jamie