[PATCH] LogFS take three

[Jan Engelhardt]

On May 17 2007 21:00, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> > > Opinions?
>> > 
>> > Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c?  Or does
>> > yours do something fundamentally different?
>> 
>> It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
>
> It might be better to use the prefix "bptree" to help prevent confusion.  A
> quick google search on "bp-tree" reveals only the perl B+-tree module
> "Tree::BPTree", a U-Maryland Java CS project on B+-trees, and a news article
> about a "BP tree-top protest".

BP heh.. How about "struct bplustree"?


	Jan
--