[PATCH] LogFS take three

Artem Bityutskiy dedekind at infradead.org
Wed May 16 07:38:18 EDT 2007

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 12:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to
> > > the name than either of its predecessors :)
> > 
> > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce
> > "JFFS2"?  ;)
> JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2.
> But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash
> filesystem.... ;-)

The problem is that JFFS2 will always be faster in terms of I/O speed
anyway, just because it does not have to maintain on-flash indexing
data structures. But yes, it is slow in mount and in building big
inodes, so the "faster" is confusing.

Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list