Two questions on mtds on x86 platform - multiple mtdram
MikeW
mw_phil at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 14 08:31:34 EDT 2007
David Woodhouse <dwmw2 <at> infradead.org> writes:
>
> On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 14:43, Somashekara DM wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We want to mount jffs2 on two mtd partitions as a part of our project.
> > Our platform is x86 - kernel version 2.4.13.
> >
> > 1. We are using mtdram ("Test driver using RAM") and blkmtd ("MTD
> > emulation using block device")
> > to create two mtd's. Our aim is to mount jffs2 on two different
> > mtds.
>
> OK. So you have two MTD devices listed in /proc/mtd?
>
> > Here are the steps we have followed.
> >
> > Step1 :
> > mknod /dev/mtd0 c 90 0
> > mknod /dev/mtd2 c 90 2
>
> This is incorrect. The MAKEDEV script in CVS is correct. The device
> numbers for the character devices alternate between 'normal' and
> read-only devices, as follows:
>
> /dev/mtd0 c 90 0
> /dev/mtdr0 c 90 1
> /dev/mtd1 c 90 2
> /dev/mtdr1 c 90 3
> /dev/mtd2 c 90 4
> /dev/mtdr2 c 90 5
>
> So what you've called '/dev/mtd2' is in fact what _should_ be called
> '/dev/mtd1', and is hence the second of the two MTD devices (In fact,
> /dev/mtd2 would be a _third_ device, which does not exist in your
> system).
>
> > and
> > mknod /dev/mtdblock0 b 31 0
> > mknod /dev/mtdblock2 b 31 2
>
> These are correct device numbers and names but as before, /dev/mtdblock2
> refers to a third MTD device which does not exist in your system. Make
> /dev/mtdblock1 (b 31 1) and use that.
>
> > mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock2 /mnt/jffs2drive2 //this mount fails
> > error - "mount: fs type jffs2 not supported by kernel"
>
> What it actually means is 'block device /dev/mtdblock2 does not exist'.
> But mount(2) doesn't return sensible errors.
>
> > 2. Can we create multiple partitions on the 'mtdram'?
> > Can you give us the procedure for that?
>
> No partitions, but you can load the mtdram module twice (with different
> names) so that you get two devices.
>
Does this mean that in order to create several mtd devices on mtdram,
I can just create several device nodes with different minor device numbers ?
If so, I presume this means that all devices must share the same
size and erasesize ?
Regards,
Mike
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
....gmane.padding........................................................
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list