UBI: Can we handle -EINTR differently in erase/write path???

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:37 +0530, Vinit Agnihotri wrote:
> Hi heres few code snip from erase_worker(); from wl.c
> if (err != -EIO) {
>         /*
>          * If this is not %-EIO, we have no idea what to do. Scheduling
>          * this physical eraseblock for erasure again would cause
>          * errors again and again. Well, lets switch to RO mode.
>          */
>         ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
>         return err;
>     }

Yeah, you are right, feel free to send a patch. The only thing I am
curious about where, at what point the task can be interrupted?

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)