UBI: io_write_path

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Hi,

On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 16:01 +0530, brijesh.singh at calsoftinc.com wrote:
> Hi,
>    I walked through eba_write path.I found that,if EBUSY or EAGAIN is
> returned as err code from ubi_io_write_vid_hdr or ubi_io_write_data
> ,still the PEB is put back to wear-levelling.This is
> unnecessary.Shouldn't it retry on same PEB again?

AFAICS if any error except -EIO is returned, we just return it up (see
below)

Probably you are right, -EBUSY and -EAGAIN could be treated differently.
We could put this LEB and try a new one. But we cannot try the same one
I guess, at least it does not sound safe. Who knows, may be something
was written? It is safer to take a new PEB. But yes, it is not
necessarily to torture this LEB in case of -EBUSY and -EAGAIN.

Feel free to send a patch. It would be also nice if you pointed when MTD
could return these errors, because I doubt it is possible in current
implementation. But anyways, handling those gracefully is good.


> Code Snip:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> retry:
> 	pnum = ubi_wl_get_peb(ubi, dtype);
> 	if (pnum < 0) {
> 		ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
> 		leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
> 		return pnum;
> 	}
> 
> 	err = ubi_io_write_vid_hdr(ubi, pnum, vid_hdr);
> 	if (err) {
> 		ubi_warn("failed to write VID header to LEB %d:%d, PEB %d",
> 			 vol_id, lnum, pnum);
> 		goto write_error;
> 	}
> 
> 	err = ubi_io_write_data(ubi, buf, pnum, offset, len);
> 	if (err) {
> 		ubi_warn("failed to write %d bytes at offset %d of LEB %d:%d, " "PEB
> %d", len, offset, vol_id, lnum, pnum);
> 		goto write_error;
> 	}
> ...
> 
> write_error:
> 	if (err != -EIO || !ubi->bad_allowed) {
> 		ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
> 		leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
> 		ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
> 		return err;
> 	}

So here we switch to RO mode and return the error up. We could do
better. Like -ENOMEM should not cause switching to RO mode. -EAGAIN and
-EBUSY - similarly.

I bet there are other places where error handling could be smarter. Feel
free to send patches.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)