[RFC] [PATCH] UBI: convert to kthread API

[Josh Boyer]

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:47 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
> 
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:50 +0100, Alexander Schmidt wrote:
> > UBI should use the kthread API, which makes completions and signal
> > handling go away.
> 
> how feasible and possible is to get rid of this UBI unit altogether?

Depends I suppose.  Is it going to make a large runtime functionality or
performance impact if a background thread isn't running?

josh