[PATCH] UBI: introduce sequential counter

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 08:50 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Having them generate a unique number for seqnum isn't _required_ though
> right?  UBI will see them all as 0 and still work if I understand
> correctly.

Yes. I is not required to be done immediately. But in order to be able
to smoothly remove legacy stuff, it should be done better sooner then
later.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)