State of UBI

[David Woodhouse]

On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 07:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'll politely disagree here.  UBI _does_ need this on NAND to be
> really usable.  Otherwise you eat 2 pages per block for UBI metadata,
> and that is quite a bit of overhead for a handful of bytes in the
> structures.

"A handful of bytes" ought to fit into the spare area, and not take real
data pages at all.

-- 
dwmw2