[PATCH] cfi: Fixup of write errors on XIP
Nicolas Pitre
nico at cam.org
Wed Mar 29 11:44:34 EST 2006
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> I think both solutions, although they fix this particular problem, are
> not addressing the fundamental issue which is that the current code
> structure to cope with XIP and non-XIP is becoming a total mess. In
> fact the whole timeout/error handling should be factored out of every
> functions into a sincle subfunction, actually one for XIP and one for
> non-XIP. This way the non-XIP case would not have to care about chip
^^^^^^^
[I mean the XIP case of course]
> state changing since that cannot happen, and the timeout treshold would
> be more accurately computed as well.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list