[PATCH 1/1] UBI

Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 07:36:19 EDT 2006


On 6/27/06, Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind at infradead.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Frank announced about UBI some time ago
> (http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2006-June/015887.html)
>
> The UBI GIT tree is now at git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git, or
> http://git.infradead.org/?p=ubi-2.6.git;a=summary at WEB.
>
> Here is the UBI patch for your review.

Thanks for sending this out.

Here's some questions:

Does the range for bad eraseblock reserve really need to be up to 1/2
the device?

Perhaps all the MTD_UBI_DEBUG options could be hidden in a seperate
Kconfig file that is sourced.  As it stands now, it's fairly bloated
for a large majority of options that won't get enabled.

Why all the forward declarations of structures in the various header
files?  Couldn't this be done by properly including the header files
that are needed?

This is a short list at the moment.  I need to find some more time to
dig into the patch.

josh




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list