squashfs and NAND flash
jwboyer at gmail.com
Fri Apr 28 08:36:31 EDT 2006
On 4/28/06, Phillip Lougher <phillip at lougher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > There is gain in providing a generic mechansim that block type
> > filesystems can use to do this though. Simple economics are going to
> > drive more devices to have NAND parts than NOR, so something needs to
> > eventually fill this gap.
> I think I was maybe a little unclear as to what I meant. I think a
> generic mechanism that block filesystems could use would be very useful.
> What I meant was providing NAND support in Squashfs would generate a
> lot more support requests and require more maintenance. Unfortunately,
> I don't have the resources to do this.
Oh, sure. That's understandable. You should be busy trying to get
squashfs into mainline ;)
More information about the linux-mtd