回复: Re: EBS effect
Peter J Zhu
peterjzhu at yahoo.com.cn
Wed Apr 5 01:02:57 EDT 2006
The size of my MTD device is 48M. And I used the small
block NAND with erase block size being 16KB.
--- "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <dedekind at yandex.ru>写道:
> Peter J Zhu wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > Recently I enanbled EBS with 2.6.15 on Samsung
> small
> > page(oobblock = 512B)NAND chip. The results is
> as
> > following:
> >
> > Without EBS With EBS
> >
> > Imagesize 31378292B 42379624B
> >
> > Mouttime 17s ~ 14s ~
> >
> > The overhead space is too much while providing
> NOT
> > high mout time improvement But from the thread
> > http://mhonarc.axis.se/jffs-dev/msg01763.html,
> > results seems too bad compared with what's
> claimed.
> >
> > The only diff I can imagine is that he might use
> big
> > page NAND. Any hints are very much appreciated.
> >
> What's the size of your MTD device?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Artem B. Bityutskiy,
> St.-Petersburg, Russia.
>
>
______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
____________________________________________________
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list