回复: Re: EBS effect

Peter J Zhu peterjzhu at yahoo.com.cn
Wed Apr 5 01:02:57 EDT 2006


The size of my MTD device is 48M. And I used the small
block NAND with erase block size being 16KB.

--- "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <dedekind at yandex.ru>写道:

> Peter J Zhu wrote:
> > hello,
> >  
> >   Recently I enanbled EBS with 2.6.15 on Samsung
> small
> >   page(oobblock = 512B)NAND chip. The results is
> as
> >   following:
> >   
> >              Without EBS       With EBS
> > 
> >   Imagesize  31378292B         42379624B
> > 
> >   Mouttime   17s ~             14s ~
> > 
> >   The overhead space is too much while providing
> NOT
> >   high mout time improvement But from the thread
> >   http://mhonarc.axis.se/jffs-dev/msg01763.html, 
> >   results seems too bad compared with what's
> claimed. 
> > 
> >   The only diff I can imagine is that he might use
> big
> >   page NAND. Any hints are very much appreciated. 
> > 
> What's the size of your MTD device?
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Artem B. Bityutskiy,
> St.-Petersburg, Russia.
> 
>
______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
> 



		
____________________________________________________





More information about the linux-mtd mailing list