Great jffs2 speedup
hinko.kocevar at cetrtapot.si
hinko.kocevar at cetrtapot.si
Fri Sep 30 08:26:46 EDT 2005
Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 September 2005 11:36:13 +0200, hinko.kocevar at cetrtapot.si wrote:
>
>>On new setup - using yesterdays MTD CVS and 2.6.12 kernel with EBS enabled:
>>Mounting flash4 clean partition [1]
>>real 0m 3.75s
>>user 0m 0.02s
>>sys 0m 1.17s
>>-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>Mounting flash4 dirty partition [2]
>>real 0m 0.75s
>>user 0m 0.02s
>>sys 0m 0.73s
>
Here are more tests from our system. Setup is the same as before:
system1: 2.6.11, April MTD, no EBS
system2: 2.6.12, Latest CVS, EBS
I haven't looked at the system2 clean/dirty mount times much closer, but
It appears that dirty partition is mounted faster evrytime - hence
several iterarions of the test.
I also added my testing script...
regards,
hinko
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: test_flash_2.6.11-CP_V3_08242005
Url: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20050930/23850eea/attachment.pl
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: test_flash_2.6.12
Url: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20050930/23850eea/attachment-0001.pl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_flash.sh
Type: application/x-shellscript
Size: 3248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20050930/23850eea/attachment.bin
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list