Silent GCC4.0 warning

[Marius Groeger]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Jörn Engel wrote:

> "if your write it portable in the first place" sounds nice, but noone
> really knows what that means, before the acid test happens.

I think this is a weak argument in this context. Sticking to the 
standards should always be a prime directive for any programmer. 
Moreover, /if/ I follow your argument: it's very unlikely something 
happens to the semantics of (char*)buf + i, compared to the likelihood 
of a future GCC discovering honour and making the extensions harder to 
access.

Regards,
Marius

-- 
Marius Groeger <mgroeger at sysgo.com>
SYSGO AG                      Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0                  FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.pikeos.com