JFFS2 eraseblock header

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> In any case, would you please bump the overall version of JFFS2 if this
> change is made?  I don't mean "JFFS3", I mean "JFFS2 version 2.3" or
> similar.  See super.c line 320 for where I'm talking about.
Agree, this should be done. I also offered to introduce a version number 
byte to the erasebloch header. This is somewhat ugly but will help to 
quickly recognize the JFFS2 image version. In future this will help us.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.