[PATCH] XATTR issues on JFFS2

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 21:49 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> I prefer a longer name.  jffs2_fs_xattr.h would be fine.
> jffs2_xattr.h would also, the "_fs" is more redundant that "attr".

Now would probably be a good time to drop jffs2_fs_i.h and jffs2_fs_sb.h
anyway. We no longer have the inode and superblock unions; this stuff
can be entirely contained within the fs/jffs2/ directory instead of
being in include/linux/

-- 
dwmw2