JFFS2 eraseblock header

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

David Woodhouse wrote:
> Should it? I wonder if it should silently upgrade, instead? Or at least
> have a mount option to make it upgrade? We want to leave the old format
> behind...
That would be spiffy to leave it behind and save a lot efforts.
But in this case new JFFS2 binaries will reject mounting old JFFS2 images.
If this is accaptable - fine. Personally I don't care, but people may.
:-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.