[PATCH] OneNAND: Simple Bad Block handling support
Bernhard Priewasser
priewasser at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 06:09:37 EDT 2005
> I don't know the exactly but I heard that JFFS2 handles runtime
> badblock internally.
> So OneNAND MTD don't care badblock handling in read/write function.
> MTD only care the initial bad block at erase operation.
Isn't this rather important? :-) As I said, I'm rather new to the bad
block stuff, so I'm ashamed of don't knowing it at all. Can JFFS2
recognize a bad block without OneNAND driver explicitely reporting one??
I'm very interested in this thing; presumably it may be easy to find out
having a look on the list's NAND BBT threads...
> In our commercial software, we use another bad block handling, known
> as Bad Block Management (BBM) based on replace instead of skip as BBT
> So we don't care the intial bad and runtime bad.
> Now we are trying to implement our scheme and will be released at open
> source. But not yet available in this time.
You are speaking about RFS? I'm wondering for quite a time about the
technical and commercial parallels/differences of MTD/JFFS2 and RFS...
Do you have any (public) comment on the occurence of (runtime) bad
blocks? When, why, ...?
> If do you have any question. please let me know :)
Too many to write down, but I'll try ;-)
Regards,
Bernhard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list