[PATCH]erase block header(revision 4)

[Artem B. Bityutskiy]

zhao forrest wrote:
> It's true that "c->cleanmarker_size was 0" for NAND flash.
> But besides  NAND flash, "c->cleanmarker_size was 0" is also true
> for dataflash. That means that cleanmarker was not needed for
> dataflash for some reason that I don't know :)

DataFlash is has a minimum IO unit (DataFlash block, 528/1056 AFAIR),
and has no OOB. So the cleanmarker would consume the whole DataFlash
block which considered wasteful I suppose.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.