[Fwd: mtd/fs/jffs2 erase.c, 1.85, 1.86 fs.c, 1.66, 1.67 nodelist.h, 1.140, 1.141 nodemgmt.c, 1.127, 1.128 os-linux.h, 1.64, 1.65 scan.c, 1.125, 1.126 summary.c, 1.4, 1.5 summary.h, 1.2, 1.3 wbuf.c, 1.100, 1.101]

[Josh Boyer]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Forrest Zhao <forrest.zhao at intel.com>
> To: linux-mtd-cvs at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: mtd/fs/jffs2 erase.c, 1.85, 1.86 fs.c, 1.66, 1.67 nodelist.h,
> 1.140, 1.141 nodemgmt.c, 1.127, 1.128 os-linux.h, 1.64, 1.65 scan.c,
> 1.125, 1.126 summary.c, 1.4, 1.5 summary.h, 1.2, 1.3 wbuf.c, 1.100,
> 1.101
> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:06:28 +0000
> 
> Update of /home/cvs/mtd/fs/jffs2
> In directory phoenix.infradead.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31513/fs/jffs2
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	erase.c fs.c nodelist.h nodemgmt.c os-linux.h scan.c summary.c 
> 	summary.h wbuf.c 
> Log Message:
> Clean marker is gone! This patch introduce Erase Block Header(EBH) to JFFS2. EBH resides at the beginning of each eraseb block and carries the meta data for that erase block. If you want to add new per-erase-block information, you may use EBH to make extension. Now we record the erase count of each erase block in EBH.
> Also this patch modified the user-space utilities to make them accormodate to EBH.

Erm... why did this get merged?  I don't recall a consensus on it yet.
And I thought we had said we were going to wait until the current code
was sync'd with Linus...

josh