Intel flash that powers up locked

Thomas Gleixner tglx at
Thu Jun 2 06:46:07 EDT 2005

On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:19 +0200, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:

> Why is cfi_intelext_unlock() called with ofs=0, is that correct?
> Shouldn't there be hardware addresses?

Maybe it helps if you read the code of the invoked function


More information about the linux-mtd mailing list