running out of space dd'ing JFFS2 image to /dev/mtdblock/0
Josh Boyer
jdub at us.ibm.com
Mon Jan 31 12:29:11 EST 2005
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 17:25 +0000, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 31 January 2005 17:11:38 +0000, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > > i agree completely, but i thought some of the recognized suffixes were
> > > > "KiB", "MiB" and so on. anyway, i was pretty sure that even a
> > > > suggestion this innocuous was going to generate some discussion.
> > > Nobody told about not to use KiB/MiB. It wos told about not to us K and M,
> > > like 10K, 100M. Use 10KiB, 100MiB instead.
> >
> > What information does the "B" in "10KiB" contain? And why is it "Ki"
> > instead of the correct "ki"?
> Hehe.
>
> This is just widely used unit. And it is usually written like that. And
> now most utilities work with such. But if one wants and thinks it is
> reasonable, why not to use kib :-)
Because they aren't just commonly used units. See:
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
josh
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list