mtd/fs/jffs2 nodemgmt.c,1.115,1.116

Tue Jan 25 06:55:34 EST 2005

On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:58 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Things have changed over time, so I'm not sure whether the wasted ->
> dirty accounting is still correct all over the place. It was once :)
You know, it not completely correct. When wbuf is sync-ed, the padding
is treated as wasted irrespective of its size. But this doesn't break
JFFS2, though.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.