JFFS3 & performance
joern at wohnheim.fh-wedel.de
Wed Jan 19 11:31:23 EST 2005
On Wed, 19 January 2005 15:51:14 +0000, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> Hmm. Don't know if this good.
> In case of network CRCs are always needed and the algorithm is the same.
> In our case MTD is not dedicated to JFFS2. It is consceptually wrong to
> implement this on MTD layer. This implies one more operation to drivers...
> And then one may want to use another checksum algorith.... Implement yet
> another operation? Doubts... (even understanding that this may lead to
> better performance...). Thinking more needed.
Yup, it's fairly ugly. Some ugliness in the name of performance is
fine, so benchmarks should decide.
More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency (without
necessarily achieving it) than for any other single reason - including
-- W. A. Wulf
More information about the linux-mtd