JFFS3 & performance

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 10:30 -0800, Jared Hulbert wrote:
> I think it says it's worth adding a no-checksum option to serve this
> potential userbase that just doesn't need the checksums but does need
> the speed.

You may be right. That doesn't make me relish the thought of providing
support to people who do that though :)

Perhaps we could make it a mount option, and that way it's easy enough
for people to turn it on if they have problems, before we'll talk to
them about it.

-- 
dwmw2