JFFS2-on-DataFlash : 1 - Core changes
Jörn Engel
joern at wohnheim.fh-wedel.de
Wed Feb 2 07:21:20 EST 2005
On Tue, 1 February 2005 10:44:15 +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
>
> Based on the previous comments, the patch has been split up.
>
> The changes included in this patch are:
>
> DataFlash page-sizes are not a power of two (they're multiples of 528
> bytes). There are a few places in JFFS2 code where sector_size is used
> as a bitmask. A new macro (SECTOR_ADDR) was defined to calculate these
> sector addresses. For non-DataFlash devices, the original (faster)
> bitmask operation is still used.
Nice. Being independent of specific sector sizes (power of 2,
whatever) makes jffs2 more flexible. People can decide to spend a few
bytes for for error correction, etc.
> In scan.c, the EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE was a constant of 1024.
> Since this could be larger than the sector size of the DataFlash, this
> is now basically set to MIN(sector_size, 1024).
Ok.
> Addition of a jffs2_is_writebuffered() macro.
Hmm. See below.
Overall I like the patch, module comments below.
> diff -urN -x CVS mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/erase.c mtd.core/fs/jffs2/erase.c
> --- mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/erase.c Wed Jan 26 16:07:57 2005
> +++ mtd.core/fs/jffs2/erase.c Tue Feb 1 10:06:13 2005
> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (((*prev)->flash_offset & ~(c->sector_size -1)) == jeb->offset) {
> + if (SECTOR_ADDR((*prev)->flash_offset) == jeb->offset) {
> /* It's in the block we're erasing */
> struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *this;
>
> diff -urN -x CVS mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/gc.c mtd.core/fs/jffs2/gc.c
> --- mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/gc.c Wed Jan 26 16:07:57 2005
> +++ mtd.core/fs/jffs2/gc.c Tue Feb 1 10:06:13 2005
> @@ -816,8 +816,7 @@
>
> /* Doesn't matter if there's one in the same erase block. We're going to
> delete it too at the same time. */
> - if ((raw->flash_offset & ~(c->sector_size-1)) ==
> - (fd->raw->flash_offset & ~(c->sector_size-1)))
> + if (SECTOR_ADDR(raw->flash_offset) == SECTOR_ADDR(fd->raw->flash_offset))
> continue;
>
> D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Check potential deletion dirent at %08x\n", ref_offset(raw)));
> diff -urN -x CVS mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/os-linux.h mtd.core/fs/jffs2/os-linux.h
> --- mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/os-linux.h Wed Jan 26 16:07:58 2005
> +++ mtd.core/fs/jffs2/os-linux.h Tue Feb 1 10:06:13 2005
> @@ -97,7 +97,10 @@
> #endif
> }
>
> +#define SECTOR_ADDR(x) ( ((unsigned long)(x) & ~(c->sector_size-1)) )
> +
> #define jffs2_is_readonly(c) (OFNI_BS_2SFFJ(c)->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> +#define jffs2_is_writebuffered(c) (c->wbuf != NULL)
if (jffs2_is_writebuffered(c))
if (c->wbuf)
With your definition, the code is getting longer. Not sure if I like
that part.
>
> #if (!defined CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_NAND && !defined CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_NOR_ECC)
> #define jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c) (1)
> diff -urN -x CVS mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/scan.c mtd.core/fs/jffs2/scan.c
> --- mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/scan.c Wed Jan 26 16:07:58 2005
> +++ mtd.core/fs/jffs2/scan.c Tue Feb 1 10:07:55 2005
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include "nodelist.h"
>
> -#define EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE 1024
> +#define DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE 1024
>
> #define DIRTY_SPACE(x) do { typeof(x) _x = (x); \
> c->free_size -= _x; c->dirty_size += _x; \
> @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@
> return min;
>
> }
> +
> +static inline uint32_t EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE(uint32_t sector_size) {
> + if (sector_size < DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE)
> + return sector_size;
> + else
> + return DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE;
> +}
> +
Better use min() or at least min_t(). Also, if you pass c instead of
c->sector_size, the calling code is a bit simpler.
> int jffs2_scan_medium(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
> {
> int i, ret;
> @@ -316,7 +324,7 @@
> if (!buf_size) {
> buf_len = c->sector_size;
> } else {
> - buf_len = EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE;
> + buf_len = EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE(c->sector_size);
> err = jffs2_fill_scan_buf(c, buf, buf_ofs, buf_len);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -326,10 +334,10 @@
> ofs = 0;
>
> /* Scan only 4KiB of 0xFF before declaring it's empty */
> - while(ofs < EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE && *(uint32_t *)(&buf[ofs]) == 0xFFFFFFFF)
> + while(ofs < EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE(c->sector_size) && *(uint32_t *)(&buf[ofs]) == 0xFFFFFFFF)
> ofs += 4;
>
> - if (ofs == EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE) {
> + if (ofs == EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE(c->sector_size)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_NAND
> if (jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c)) {
> /* scan oob, take care of cleanmarker */
> @@ -423,7 +431,7 @@
> bail now */
> if (buf_ofs == jeb->offset && jeb->used_size == PAD(c->cleanmarker_size) &&
> c->cleanmarker_size && !jeb->dirty_size && !jeb->first_node->next_in_ino) {
> - D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "%d bytes at start of block seems clean... assuming all clean\n", EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE));
> + D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "%d bytes at start of block seems clean... assuming all clean\n", EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE(c->sector_size)));
> return BLK_STATE_CLEANMARKER;
> }
>
> diff -urN -x CVS mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c mtd.core/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
> --- mtd.orig/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c Wed Jan 26 16:07:58 2005
> +++ mtd.core/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c Tue Feb 1 10:06:13 2005
> @@ -415,9 +415,9 @@
> int ret;
> size_t retlen;
>
> - /* Nothing to do if not NAND flash. In particular, we shouldn't
> + /* Nothing to do if not write-buffering the flash. In particular, we shouldn't
> del_timer() the timer we never initialised. */
> - if (jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c))
> + if (!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c))
> return 0;
>
> if (!down_trylock(&c->alloc_sem)) {
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> BUG();
> }
>
> - if(!c->wbuf || !c->wbuf_len)
> + if (!c->wbuf_len) /* already checked c->wbuf above */
> return 0;
>
> /* claim remaining space on the page
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
> uint32_t outvec_to = to;
>
> /* If not NAND flash, don't bother */
> - if (!c->wbuf)
> + if (!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c))
> return jffs2_flash_direct_writev(c, invecs, count, to, retlen);
>
> down_write(&c->wbuf_sem);
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@
> erase block. Anything else, and you die.
> New block starts at xxx000c (0-b = block header)
> */
> - if ( (to & ~(c->sector_size-1)) != (c->wbuf_ofs & ~(c->sector_size-1)) ) {
> + if (SECTOR_ADDR(to) != SECTOR_ADDR(c->wbuf_ofs)) {
> /* It's a write to a new block */
> if (c->wbuf_len) {
> D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_flash_writev() to 0x%lx causes flush of wbuf at 0x%08x\n", (unsigned long)to, c->wbuf_ofs));
> @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@
> {
> struct kvec vecs[1];
>
> - if (jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c))
> + if (!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c))
> return c->mtd->write(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf);
>
> vecs[0].iov_base = (unsigned char *) buf;
> @@ -857,39 +857,39 @@
> loff_t orbf = 0, owbf = 0, lwbf = 0;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!jffs2_is_writebuffered(c))
> + return c->mtd->read(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf);
> +
> /* Read flash */
> - if (!jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c)) {
> - down_read(&c->wbuf_sem);
> + down_read(&c->wbuf_sem);
>
> - if (jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c))
> - ret = c->mtd->read_ecc(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf, NULL, c->oobinfo);
> - else
> - ret = c->mtd->read(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf);
> + if (jffs2_cleanmarker_oob(c))
> + ret = c->mtd->read_ecc(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf, NULL, c->oobinfo);
> + else
> + ret = c->mtd->read(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf);
>
> - if ( (ret == -EBADMSG) && (*retlen == len) ) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "mtd->read(0x%zx bytes from 0x%llx) returned ECC error\n",
> - len, ofs);
> - /*
> - * We have the raw data without ECC correction in the buffer, maybe
> - * we are lucky and all data or parts are correct. We check the node.
> - * If data are corrupted node check will sort it out.
> - * We keep this block, it will fail on write or erase and the we
> - * mark it bad. Or should we do that now? But we should give him a chance.
> - * Maybe we had a system crash or power loss before the ecc write or
> - * a erase was completed.
> - * So we return success. :)
> - */
> - ret = 0;
> - }
> - } else
> - return c->mtd->read(c->mtd, ofs, len, retlen, buf);
> + if ( (ret == -EBADMSG) && (*retlen == len) ) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "mtd->read(0x%zx bytes from 0x%llx) returned ECC error\n",
> + len, ofs);
> + /*
> + * We have the raw data without ECC correction in the buffer, maybe
> + * we are lucky and all data or parts are correct. We check the node.
> + * If data are corrupted node check will sort it out.
> + * We keep this block, it will fail on write or erase and the we
> + * mark it bad. Or should we do that now? But we should give him a chance.
> + * Maybe we had a system crash or power loss before the ecc write or
> + * a erase was completed.
> + * So we return success. :)
> + */
> + ret = 0;
> + }
>
> /* if no writebuffer available or write buffer empty, return */
> if (!c->wbuf_pagesize || !c->wbuf_len)
> goto exit;
>
> /* if we read in a different block, return */
> - if ( (ofs & ~(c->sector_size-1)) != (c->wbuf_ofs & ~(c->sector_size-1)) )
> + if (SECTOR_ADDR(ofs) != SECTOR_ADDR(c->wbuf_ofs))
> goto exit;
>
> if (ofs >= c->wbuf_ofs) {
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Jörn
--
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list