LTP fs test results on OneNAND

[Josh Boyer]

On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 09:36 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:06 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > rwtest01                       FAIL       2
> > rwtest02                       FAIL       2
> > rwtest03                       FAIL       2
> > rwtest04                       FAIL       2
> > rwtest05                       FAIL       2
> 
> > Total Failures: 5
> 
> These are solely due to the lack of shared writable mappings, yes?
> 
> LTP tests correctness -- I like to do JFFS2 runs with some stress
> testing, like fsx-linux (and another tool called 'holey' which stresses
> the extent mapping stuff -- http://david.woodhou.se/holey.c).

Isn't fsx-linux part of the LTP now?

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/fs/fsx-linux/

Or is there some other version of it?

josh