[PATCH]fs/jffs2/wbuf.c: add compatibility support for OOB data block

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

Jörn Engel wrote:
> One reason to aggregate physical blocks into virtual ones is to save
> memory.  The aggregation code makes sure that we never spend more than
> 128k on the array of struct erase_block.  Not sure if this is really a
> valid concern, though.  Once we have such a big flash, jffs2 will
> require tons of memory anyway.
Agree, I don't think this is important. I would just swith to firm 1:1.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.