[PATCH]fs/jffs2/wbuf.c: add compatibility support for OOB data block

[Artem B. Bityuckiy]

 >diff -Narup Mtd-orig/fs/jffs2/build.c mtd/fs/jffs2/build.c
 >--- Mtd-orig/fs/jffs2/build.c	2005-07-30 17:29:27.000000000 +0200
 >+++ mtd/fs/jffs2/build.c	2005-08-11 15:17:41.000000000 +0200
 >@@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_in
 > 		c->blocks[i].first_node = NULL;
 > 		c->blocks[i].last_node = NULL;
 > 		c->blocks[i].bad_count = 0;
 >+		c->blocks[i].sum_collected = NULL;
 > 	}

And my question. Why 'sum_collected; is per-eraseblock? JFFS2 always 
writes to c->nextblock, so 'sum_collected' ought to be per-superblock, 
isn't it? Why do you inflate the c->blocks[] array ?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.