[OBORONA-SPAM] Re: inode checkpoints
Josh Boyer
jdub at us.ibm.com
Mon Oct 4 08:34:02 EDT 2004
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 05:36, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> > It seems to make a lot of sense. We could write such checkpoints only on
> > files which are large enough to warrant them, and we could tune the
> > frequency of such checkpoints.
>
> The following are required features (as I think) of the checkpoint
> creation algorithm and strategy.
> 1 New checkpoint nodes must not be created if there is little free space
> left on the file system.
> 2 New checkpoint nodes ought to be created only for large inodes.
Can we extend this to be "files with a large amount of nodes"? I'm
thinking of the fifo problem here too...
> 3 The checkpoint nodes creation process must not decrease the JFFS2
> performance very much.
>
> Checkpoints should be created in background by the GC thread. GC begins
> creating checkpoints if the following is true:
eCos doesn't have a GC thread IIRC. Not a big deal in my opinion, but
others might care :).
josh
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list