Problems with DiskOnChip 2000

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 23:12, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 23:05 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > None of those ID's is a valid chip ID except the 0x36, which is a
> > 64MiB,1.8V chip. I doubt, that there are DoC's available with 1.8V
> > supply. The stuff looks more like random nonsense.
> 
> That's DiskOnChip ChipID, not NAND chip ID. But yes, it looks like
> random crap from other addresses, probably BIOS or extension ROMs.

Yep, I mixed that up.

tglx