one more field in raw_node_ref ?

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 11:34 +0300, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> Hello guys,
> 
> I would be happy to know your opinions about to introduce one more 
> 32-bit field to the node_ref structure in the JFFS2. Is this really bad?

Yes but if you make a really good case for it and you finish the bits
which allow us to drop the length field we might let you get away with
it :)

-- 
dwmw2