JFFS2 & NAND failure

[David Woodhouse]

On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 22:13 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 19:19 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > This is the problem, surely? If we've refiled the nextblock, we should
> > return retlen == 0.
> 
> Can you try this patch against current CVS? I've already split the
> refiling off into a separate function we can call, and I've also fixed
> it to write from the wbuf if it's full.

Any progress? If it's working and you agree it's sufficient then we
should commit it.

-- 
dwmw2