Horrible Bug? AMD29LV400BB with mtd in 2.6.10rc2
K.F.J. Martens
gmc at metro.cx
Fri Dec 3 12:11:41 EST 2004
Hi Ben,
You are everywhere :)
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:46:01AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:56:07PM +0100, K.F.J. Martens wrote:
> > If I reverse them like so:
> >
> >
> > [0] = MTD_UADDR_0x0555_0x02AA, /* x8 */
> > [1] = MTD_UADDR_0x0AAA_0x0555, /* x16 */
> >
>
> There has been some fixing in the jedec and similar probe code
> to fix the use of the fields of device width / overlap due to
> incorrect addressing being used for the chip commands.
Meaning that a patch is indeed being submitted right now? It can be
confusing though, how the terms x8 and x16 are used in the datasheets et
al.
Kind regards,
Koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list