Horrible Bug? AMD29LV400BB with mtd in 2.6.10rc2

[K.F.J. Martens]

Hi Ben,

You are everywhere :)

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:46:01AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:56:07PM +0100, K.F.J. Martens wrote:
> > If I reverse them like so:
> > 
> > 
> >                         [0] = MTD_UADDR_0x0555_0x02AA,  /* x8 */
> >                         [1] = MTD_UADDR_0x0AAA_0x0555,  /* x16 */
> > 
> 
> There has been some fixing in the jedec and similar probe code
> to fix the use of the fields of device width / overlap due to
> incorrect addressing being used for the chip commands. 

Meaning that a patch is indeed being submitted right now? It can be
confusing though, how the terms x8 and x16 are used in the datasheets et
al. 

Kind regards,

Koen


-- 
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, embedded systems, unix expertise, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/