128MB DOC2000 with 2.4.X kernel

Brendan Simon BrendanSimon at fastmail.fm
Thu Aug 12 01:27:11 EDT 2004


Dan Brown wrote:

>>    3) Recommend using 2.6 kernel and latest MTD tree.
>>    
>>
>This would still be my recommendation, however, there has been some effort
>in the last few days to allow the latest MTD code to compile under the 2.4
>series.  If you're dead-set against switching to 2.6, it might be worth your
>time to grab the latest MTD snapshot, patch your 2.4 kernel using the
>included script, and see what happens.  No promises.
>  
>
Depends whether it would patch to 2.4.18 sucessfully or whether it is 
designed to patch to 2.4.26 or 2.4.27.  If I have to do work to get it 
to patch, then the time might be better spent porting 2.6.x to my board :)

>>Is the 96MB DOC2000 more like the 64MB model or the 128MB model?
>>i.e. can I use a 96MB DOC2000 with my existing 2.4.18 kernel or will I
>>have the same problems as the 128MB DOC.
>>    
>>
>INFTL [Inverse NAND Flash Translation Layer] M-Systems' latest flash
>management algorithm, used by the TrueFFS driver for the following devices:
>
>- DiskOnChip Millennium Plus
>- Mobile DiskOnChip Plus
>- DiskOnChip 2000 DIP (high), 384Mbytes and higher.
>- DiskOnChip 2000 DIP (low), 192Mbytes and higher.
>
>If I had reviewed this table before I responded to your email, I would have
>noticed that the 128M DOC ought to use NFTL.  Are you sure you have a part
>that "looks like a Millennium"?  (All DOC2000 parts that use the Millennium
>hardware interface also use INFTL, and vice versa.)  I'm willing to believe
>the MSYS docs I have might be out of date (I'm pretty sure the
>low-profile/high-profile boundary has changed), but it would be good to
>confirm this.
>  
>
I can confirm that the 128MB DOC I received in Australia definately DOES 
NOT work.  i.e. it looks like it has the new ASIC embedded in it.  A 
friend of mine in the USA also sees the same thing on his newly received 
128MB DOC.  Therefore I think the M-System docs are wrong.

Anyone know about the 96MB DOC2000 ????
Is it an old style or new style DOC2000 ????

Cheers,
Brendan Simon.





More information about the linux-mtd mailing list