patch for AMD am29dl800b
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri Apr 2 00:57:32 EST 2004
Please don't reply to unrelated threads. This isn't about bad blocks and
doesn't live with the message to which you replied.
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:01 -0600, David Updegraff wrote:
> I have a gadget with this amd chip on it. Whose id and layout dfn. is
> not in the jedec_probe tables. Unfortuanately, they have _SIX_ (6)
> erase regions. Anyone know of a reason expanding the regions array to
> 6 is a bad idea? Or why dealing with this chip in general is a bad idea?
Hmmm. And this chip really doesn't do CFI?
I wonder how much space we take up with this table, and if we should put
the regions outside the table rather than inline ("ulong *regions").
More information about the linux-mtd